Tag Archives: messages

Nonprofits, you still need someone managing communications (& who knows how to do it)

a primitive figure, like a petroglyph, shots through a megaphone

A county in the state where I live is considering laying off several emergency response administration staff, including the communications person, due to a severe funding shortage. The thinking is that another agency can step in and lend some staff for the job when the need arises.

A local nonprofit decided that it didn’t need a dedicated communications person and handed the job off to a staff member with no training in such. The result: social media posts that don’t say the same thing as the web site, incorrect dates announced for events or deadlines, public online complaints going unanswered, an annual financial report where the numbers, literally, did not add up, lack of signage at events, lack of photos of program activities, no notice at all about the traffic pattern in front of its thrift store being significantly altered such as to prevent left turns into the parking lot, and more. But, hey, look at the money saved by not paying someone for this job!

I’m watching a nonprofit now, one that has long had a reputation of inclusion and celebrated its focus on equity, give up on having its web site materials up-to-date in both English and Spanish, and no longer take steps to ensure its web site updates are accessible to people with disabilities. Why? Because they no longer have a communications person who is driving those priorities.

I’m watching a nonprofit post its images for events on social media without putting the most important text in the body of the post or putting in alt text, thereby not only excluding people who use screen readers but also missing out on search engine optimization, which not only affects how many people actually find the event but also will mean if, some time in the future, they need to go back and see how they marketed something, they will have a difficult if not impossible time finding that post, as there’s nothing for a search engine to search for (there’s no text!). Why aren’t they doing this? Because they no longer have a communications person who is driving those priorities.

I’m seeing a disturbing trend among nonprofits and government agencies thinking that communications can be done by just anyone: another person on staff who has other responsibilities and no training can just pick up the work that used to be done by someone in that position, or a volunteer intern, with little or no experience, can do it, or how about an AI tool to write content and post it, respond to clients, etc.?

Communications staff don’t just create and post messaging. Communications staff also are engaging in activities to LISTEN to what is being said. They are reading and analyzing feedback. They are building relationships with others to help amplify messaging and to create listening channels back to the organization. They are building trust with the community, and their work affects everything: fundraising, partnerships, volunteer engagement and more.

It is bizarre and disturbing to see so many organizations and programs decide they don’t need a dedicated, trained communications person – a human – even part-time, in this era of mass misinformation and mass misunderstanding, both of which have led to people being openly hostile to government and nonprofit programs that have enjoyed wide, bipartisan public support for generations.

If management at or funders of your nonprofit or government agency are rethinking having a dedicated communications person, then they don’t understand what a communications staff person does, and everyone who believes that a communications person is fundamentally important to a program needs to get busy now educating them on that.

Does your communications manager ever present to staff or the board about trends they are seeing in customer communications or complaints? Or talk to your staff or board about communications challenges and how they have been handled? Do you do more than just present statistics on visitors to social media or web site; do you also provide examples of feedback, or show how social media posts affect ticket sales or event attendance? Are you asking every new donor, every event attendee and event new volunteer, “How did you hear about our program?” and then reporting that back to senior management?

Also see my other recommendations on nonprofit communications.

Design Checklist: What to Review Before Publishing a Communications Product

How to do a fundraising, volunteer recruitment or other video on the cheap for your nonprofit.

What is your social media manager doing?

Prepare now to leverage International Year of Volunteers for Sustainable Development 2026

Why the Verboort Sausage & Kraut Festival is successful as a fundraiser & community event & what you can learn from it

The Nonprofit & NGO Guide to Using Reddit.

Could your organization be deceived by GOTCHA media?

Social networks continue to lose their influence & that hurts nonprofits. What to do?

Reaching women in socially-conservative areas, even in other countries

UNHCR web sites are NOT focused on helping refugees & that is shameful.

The PR genius of Collie J, Grambling’s Man with the Golden Pen.

The campaign against US nonprofits has been a long time coming. The worst of it is starting. Are you ready?

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

Why I won’t follow you on Twitter

A few organizations and individuals have told me they aren’t happy that I don’t follow them on Twitter and Facebook and Google+, and, in addition, that I don’t also subscribe to their email newsletters and subscribe to their blogs.

Here’s the deal: you have to earn my follow on Twitter.

I follow you on Twitter if most of your posts are:

  • conversation starters
  • provocative (make me think)
  • elicit feedback
  • directly, immediately relate to my work

If, by contrast, I really like your organization, but your tweets are mostly positive, benign PR pieces like

  • “We have a new catalog”
  • “Our volunteers are hugable”
  • “Our Executive Director is at such-and-such conference”
  • “Our shop hours are changing for winter”

I’m probably going to follow you on Facebook rather than Twitter (if at all).

In addition, if you post to Facebook and you gateway those posts to Twitter, I’m probably going to just follow you on Facebook as well, and not at all on Twitter, because it’s doubtful your message is something I need to read ASAP, and it’s probably too long for Twitter anyway (I really hate truncated Tweats that end with a link to a Facebook status).

I check Twitter at least twice a day. To me, it’s a place for information exchange and debate, and for breaking news, for you need to look at this NOW messages. I’ve noticed that organizations, institutions and consultants that use Twitter with this in mind aren’t surprised when they get comments or questions via Twitter – they even seem to delight at such. By contrast, organizations that use it primarily as an announcement tool get immediately defensive when someone tries to engage them on Twitter – and it’s why I prefer to follow those organizations on Facebook.

Same if most of your posts are “I’m at the airport” or “I’m at such-and-such conference.” It’s nice to know that, but it’s not that much of a priority, so I’ll follow you on Facebook instead.

I check my professional account on Facebook about once a day. I scroll through the updates to get a general idea of what organizations are up to. Not much in term of exchanges or debates are going on over on Facebook among the organizations and institutions I follow – it’s more of a “hey, look how fabulous we are” or “hey, we need money!” place. That’s a shame – it could be so much more – but that’s how it’s shaking down among the organizations I follow on Facebook (and GooglePlus, for that matter). So I pour myself a second cup of coffee and slog through your Facebook status updates, rarely finding anything that makes me go “Wow.” Exceptions? There are a few – and I’ll highlight those on next week’s blogs.

And I may choose to read your email newsletter instead of following you on Facebook or Google Plus or Twitter. Don’t be hurt. I like email newsletters. I like that long moment of single focus and well-written narrative that gives me a more detailed picture about your work than any Tweet or Facebook status update could allow. I do my best to make time to read all that I subscribe to. And as I still have more subscribers for my own email newsletter, Tech4Impact than Twitter or Facebook followers, I appreciate the value of email newsletters.

So, how should you follow me online?

  • Follow me on Twitter if you want lots of short updates from me regarding nonprofits / NGOs, volunteers / volunteering, humanitarian / development / aid, communications, tech4good, and empowering women & girls (updates regarding national and state parks, and tourism as a development tool, are also showing up as well). Or if you want to engage, today, right now, about any of those topics, in a very public way.
  • Follow me on  Facebook or Google+ if you want just 1-3 short updates from me a day, mostly only about what I’m doing: a new web page, a new blog, a conference where I’ll be speaking, etc. And, FYI, there’s nothing I post at Facebook or Google+ that I don’t also post on Twitter; I repeat probably only 25% of what I post to Twitter on Facebook and Google+. And, yes, I post exactly the same things to Facebook and Google+ – I’ve yet to see any reason to use them differently.
  • Subscribe to my email newsletter if you want to hear from me just once a month, or you want a once-a-month tech tip, in detail, especially for nonprofits, then subscribe to Tech4Impact. You will also get a list of all the blogs I’ve published in the last four weeks or so. I get the impression that each of my email subscribers also follow me on Facebook OR Google+ OR Twitter, but not all three.

That’s not how everyone uses social networking. But that’s how I’ve decided to use it. And it could change. In fact, it’s guaranteed that it WILL change, as social media changes.

I would never expect anyone to follow me on on Twitter and Facebook and Google+, and to subscribe to my email newsletter. Unless you were some freaky stalker. Please don’t be a freaky stalker. You probably don’t need to hear about a web page I’ve just updated four times in one morning.

What about LinkedIn? Those connections are for my professional colleagues, PERIOD. Keeping it as a professional networking space has what kept it so valuable to me.

Also see: