On Facebook, I’ve just liked “Crowdsourcing Sucks,” which I originally found on Twitter under crowdsource666. Its motto: “Crowdsourcing, the scourge of the graphic design industry.”
How can a person such as myself that has been an evangelist for virtual volunteering, including crowdsourcing, since the 1990s, like this person or organization or whatever it is?
Because I do see his/her/their point.
I don’t trust a nonprofit organization that doesn’t involve volunteers in some way – but I also don’t trust an organization that talks about volunteers in terms of hourly monetary values of service given, as this says, “We involve volunteers because we don’t have to pay them! Look at the money we saved in not having to hire someone to do this work!” There is far greater value of volunteer involvement than that.
So, rock on crowdsource666.
Also see:
- EU agencies exploiting interns?
- When to NOT pay interns, redux
- When to NOT pay interns
- Are Interns Exploited?.
- Pizzeria tries to recruit unpaid interns, feels Internet’s wrath
- Do NOT say “Need to Cut Costs? Involve Volunteers!”
- Value of Volunteers – Still Beating the Drum
- Another anti-volunteer union
- Criticism Continues for UK Government Talk Re Volunteers
- International Association of Fire Fighters is anti-volunteer
- Volunteers are suing