At the start of any workshop I lead related to virtual volunteering, I ask the audience, “How many of you are engaging with volunteers virtually?” If few or no people raise their hands, I ask the question again at the end of my workshop. And the numbers always change.
Take for example the webinar I did recently for TechSoup’s audience on the best assignments for online volunteers. As usual, I ask a few minutes into the workshop how many people were involving online volunteers. The results:
So I went through the workshop and then, at the end, asked the question again. This time:
The term “virtual volunteering” is a contested term. Some people define oh-so-strictly: remote volunteers who never come on-site at an organization, and all of their service is conducted online. That means people who translate documents wouldn’t be considered online volunteers, because they aren’t actually using the Internet for their service, they are using their skills. So often, organizations are involving online volunteers – they are engaging in virtual volunteering – but because of the definition they’ve decided upon before the workshop, they have no idea they are engaged in the practice.
That’s why, at the start of any workshop, after the first poll of the room or the webinar attendees, I offer my definition of virtual volunteering:
Volunteers completing tasks, in whole or in part, off-site from the organization being assisted, using any Internet-connected device (computer, smart phone, etc.).
That means a volunteer could perform most of his or her service for an organization on-site, but if he or she is doing some of the service from home – designing a logo, tagging photos with keywords, writing an article for a newsletter, participating in an online community of fellow volunteers – that person is also engaging in virtual volunteering.
Offering that broader definition at workshops makes people realize that, indeed, they are engaging with volunteers online, and a workshop about virtual volunteering isn’t going to help them introduce the practice; it is, instead, going to help them expand what they are already doing.
In The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook, my co-author, Susan Ellis, and I talk a lot about how to expand virtual volunteering at organizations without ever saying the phrase “virtual volunteering.” We find that many organizations have an easier time accepting that five volunteers are working from their home, or work places, or coffee shops writing articles for the upcoming blog than accepting “We’ve introduced a virtual volunteering scheme!”
In fact, I have a confession to make: sometimes I don’t like the phrase virtual volunteering, or any of the other phrases – e-volunteering, micro-volunteering, crowdsourcing, and so on. These terms segregate volunteers into different groups. They cause people who are working with volunteers online in some way to say, “Oh, I’m not engaged in virtual volunteering – the volunteers I work with are real!” Sometimes, I’d like to just talk about volunteers and volunteering. But, the phrase is important, because talking about the best ways to support and involve volunteers using Internet tools, specifically, is important.
If you have a favorite networking tool for working with volunteers, we would love to hear about it? Is it Facebook? Twitter? An online collaborative space like wikispaces? Share your favorite tools – or questions about tools – in the comments below or at the Digital Engagement branch of the TechSoup Community forum!
And check out the on-demand webinar on those best assignments for online volunteers here.