Category Archives: CSR

Corporate employees are often not successful at virtual volunteering. Why?

In the 1990s, when I began promoting virtual volunteering – people engaging in volunteer roles and tasks via their computer from home, work, or wherever else they might be – many corporations balked at the idea of allowing employees to from their desktops. The reason given was usually that it would take away from employee’s productivity and profitability on behalf the company. The Disney Corporation happily put an item in their employee newsletter about virtual volunteering back in the late 1990s, but talked about it being a great thing employees could do from home, after work.

Now, almost 30 years later, I’m seeing a new trend: people promoting virtual volunteering as a great way for corporate employees to engage in philanthropy – in this case, the giving of their time and expertise – from their workspace, whether that workspace is at home or onsite at the company, but claiming that one of the benefits is that it is “time agnostic”, as one company put it: you do it when you have some extra time between work responsibilities, and it doesn’t come with all the challenges of traditional volunteering, like taking up SO much time.

I’ve seen this kind of thinking from the corporate world about all volunteering, not just virtual volunteering, and the results are poor, even disastrous, for the nonprofit, charity, school, NGO or community group trying to engage that employee as a volunteer:

  • The employee never does find that “extra” time in the work day, or after the work day, to complete the assignment. This is because, for volunteering to happen, you have to make the time for it – even if that time is at 8 p.m. in the evening, for an hour, that time has to be reserved and honored.
  • The employer is thrilled to celebrate that employees are undertaking virtual volunteering, but balk at the idea of the employee setting aside time during the work day to do it. Mentoring that young person or designing that brochure suddenly is not something the employer wants employees focused on – there is WORK to be done!
  • Both the employer and the employee don’t treat the host agency as a client, with real deadlines and real needs. Yes, very often virtual volunteering can be done on your own schedule, but only up to a point: there is a deadline associated with the role or task, or their are meetings or real-time, online activities associated with the task. If the volunteer doesn’t fulfill that role or task, the client – the nonprofit, the charity, the school, etc. – suffers. For one example, think about that student expecting to be mentored: what are the consequences for that student when the mentor cancels repeatedly? What does this do to one of the program goals, which was to build a trusting relationship between a mentor and that student?

Virtual volunteering is REAL volunteering, and so much of the “rules” of traditional volunteering still apply. Commitments are REAL. Deadlines are REAL. There’s nothing “virtual” about it. Corporations need to have strategies to address all of the aforementioned bullet points if they want virtual volunteering to actually make a difference for anyone.

cover of Virtual Volunteering book with hands raising up various Internet connected devices

If only there was a detailed guide that could better guarantee their success in their virtual volunteering endeavors… oh, wait, there is! The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook is for those that to dig deep into the factors for success in supporting online volunteers and keeping virtual volunteering a worthwhile endeavor for everyone involved. You will not find a more detailed guide anywhere than The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook. It’s based on many years of experience, from a variety of organizations. It’s like having me do an in-depth analysis of your program, or me helping you set up your own program, but without having to pay my hourly rate as a consultant! It’s available both as a traditional print publication and as a digital book.

If you have benefited from any of my blogs or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help.

When nonprofits don’t like your pro bono expertise

It can be just one person volunteering their expertise or a group of people from the business world gathering together to leverage their expertise for a nonprofit. They may build apps or create communications plans or build web sites for nonprofits. And this type of pro bono consulting can be a terrific thing: the nonprofit gets something it needs, and the expert volunteers, usually from the corporate sector, may get a team-building and/or networking event that also checks a corporate social responsibility (CSR) box.

But it doesn’t always work out that way. Sometimes, at the end of that hackathon, the nonprofit doesn’t get the app it needs. Sometimes, at the end of that build-a-thon, the nonprofit doesn’t get the revamped web site it was counting on to replace its current, out-dated site, or gets a site that does not at all meet its requirements.

Sometimes, it’s not a huge deal that the pro bono consulting doesn’t work out. I once helped with a brainstorming session for a nonprodit that the branch of a very well-known consulting firm wanted to do. The employees were excited that they could offer free consulting regarding how to better market the nonprofit’s programs. Imagine my disappointment when I realized the consultants hadn’t read any of the material they had been sent beforehand, and therefore they had a complete misunderstanding of our programs. I spent the majority of the brainstorming session explaining the programs of the nonprofit, and we were left empty-handed regarding any strategies or new insights. But all I lost was, altogether, a full-day of work, in terms of setup and the actual meeting; I have to admit I wasn’t really expecting much from this “partnership.” The nonprofit did get a photo of the employees altogether in a room, looking interested as a nonprofit staff person spoke, and we both got to use that photo in a variety of marketing material.

But I’ve been involved in organizing volunteering events where volunteers from the business sector are supposed to, at the end of the day, have created something tangible that the participating nonprofits need, and the nonprofit’s disappointment is not just a minor inconvenience: that nonprofit participated specifically to get that graphic or app or marketing strategy or web site, and now they are left in the lurch. They were counting on this volunteer endeavor to result in something they could use. And when the nonprofit staff realize that despite all of their own work – and that would be extra work, on top of their day-to-day responsibilities – they are leaving empty-handed, their frustration can turn into anger and bad public relations.

How does it happen?

  • The corporate volunteers didn’t take the commitment seriously, didn’t budget time for their participation, etc.
  • The corporate volunteers didn’t learn about the nonprofit beforehand, didn’t treat the nonprofit the way they would a paying client, didn’t listen to the nonprofit staff, etc.
  • The corporate volunteers just wanted to say, “We volunteered an entire Saturday helping so-and-so. Here’s some photos of us volunteering.”

If you are organizing a hackathon or other event meant to result in a tangible product for a nonprofit, please remember to temper expectations:

  • Emphasize to volunteers that the nonprofits are their clients. The volunteers need to treat the nonprofits the way they would paying clients: their needs are real, and if their needs aren’t met, if they aren’t listened to, they have every right to complain.
  • Be honest about what the nonprofit really is going to have at the end of this hackathon, build-a-thon or other volunteering project. Don’t hype expectations.
  • Be clear about what nonprofits can expect from volunteers in terms of support after the event. And it’s worth noting that, in my experience, no matter how much volunteers say they will continue to support the nonprofit with the hackathon or build-a-thon is over, when the event ends, the volunteers scatter and the nonprofit is on its own with the resulting app, graphics, marketing plan, web site, whatever.
  • Be honest about the possibility that not every nonprofit walks away with something they can use. If you have been doing this program for a while, say what percentage that might be: “Of the 20 participating nonprofits, we find that at least 2, unfortunately, don’t end up with a usable web site.” You might want to emphasize the experimental nature of what is happening, that this is a change for two groups from different sectors to get to know each other and have fun, and that the resulting product is a somewhat secondary goal (although, please remember that nonprofit staff are underpaid and overworked – they may not be looking for a feel-good event right now).
  • Consider scheduling a low-profile makeup session that will take place two or three weeks after the main event, where select, veteran volunteers will gather and ensure the “left out” nonprofits DO get the finished product they signed up for. Have the date for this after-main-event makeup function on the calendar and book committed volunteers to participate at the same time you are putting together your main event, so that you can say with confidence to disappointed nonprofits: “We have a makeup event scheduled for such-and-such date and we already have volunteers lined up and we will get your needs taken care of.” In fact, you may want to pay the people who are going to do the makeup work – even just a stipend – to better guarantee they show up and get the job done.
  • Let nonprofits grade their experience participating in the event and their experience with the volunteers specifically; volunteers with low grades don’t get to participate in the future, or have to go through some sort of training that will help them not let nonprofits down in the future.
  • Consider paying nonprofits for their participation. A stipend of $500 to a nonprofit can offset any hard feelings for, at the end of the day, not having that app, graphic, marketing strategy or web site that they were supposed to get per their participation.

Does it all seem like too much? Are you thinking, “Hey, nonprofits should be glad they are getting free expertise, no matter how it works out for them!”? Then, please, don’t do these events for nonprofits, because all you are doing is creating unrealistic expectations and a lot of disappointment. The work of nonprofits is serious and their staff members are grossly underpaid – if they are paid at all. They don’t have time for unfunded experiments and feel-good corporate team-building social events. Show them the respect they deserve!

Also see:

If you have benefited from this blog, my other blogs, or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

NOTE: I’m taking August off from weekly blogging. See you in September!

Apps4Good should be based in reality, not be tech fluff

I sent out this tweet thread December 3 from my Twitter account:

Listened to a podcast by someone wanting to develop an app to address a particular community need. He has no stats regarding the need, no research showing his approach is what partner agencies or potential clients want. Just talked about #app4good he’ll develop. (1/5) #CSR

This project leader has no experience regarding this particular community need. None. It’s another case of someone from the corporate world deciding that he knows what nonprofits or at-risk community members need, with no data or research to back that up. (2/5)

Looked at the web site. It’s very slick, uses all the buzzwords. You have to really read (which most folks won’t) to realize every project is in development, that no people with actual expertise in this issue are involved in this supposed nonprofit effort. (3/5)

It’s great that folks from the corporate / business / tech world want to help with community issues. Your involvement is vital. But just as you have to do your homework before developing an app for consumers, you have to do research before you develop an #app4good#CSR (4/5)

Years of experience in the tech sector doesn’t prepare app creators for addressing homelessness, hunger or street harassment, or navigating mass transit, or working in emergencies. You must talk in-depth with the experts: nonprofits & their clients. (5/5)

I’ve written a LOT about how folks from the corporate world, from executive directors to app developers, don’t talk to nonprofits before they develop tech tools for their clients. Here’s more:

And then there is this brilliant tweet from World Bank Water, an initiative of the World Bank:

To paraphrase a comment I wrote in a previous blog, it’s wonderful to see so many tech4good / apps4good / hacks4good initiatives anywhere in the world, but I see way too much attention being spent on their launch, on their promise, and not nearly enough researching if this is really what clients or the community wants, let alone evaluating their impact and sustainability after launch. And if we don’t focus on those things, then they are just tech fluff.

One-ish Day Activities for Volunteering Using IT (Hacks4Good, for instance)

UPDATED: One-ish Day Activities for IT Volunteers or Volunteering Using IT (Hacks4Good, for instance)

image of a panel discussion

For a couple of decades now, volunteers have been getting together for intense, one-day events, or events of just a few days, to build web pages, to write code (hackathons, apps4good, etc.), to edit Wikipedia pages, to transcribe historical documents and more. These have usually been, in the past, gatherings of onsite volunteers, where everyone is in one location, together, but even before the global pandemic, these activities were involving or mobilizing remote volunteers – online volunteers helping from wherever they were in the world.

This resource has been revised to take into consideration more virtual volunteering / remote volunteering, rather than everyone being in the same room. The revision, with greater emphasis on remote volunteers, was prompted by probably half a dozen inquiries to me in the last four months saying something along these lines:

We have all these corporations / businesses calling us because nonprofits have suspended their onsite volunteering. These companies want to engage in group online volunteering, but don’t know what that would really look like.

In addition to updating One-ish Day Activities for IT Volunteers or Volunteering Using IT (Hacks4Good, for instance), these folks should also view these ideas for high-impact virtual volunteering projects.

But with all that said, businesses/corporations also need to keep in mind that nonprofits are under terrific financial strain right now. They need to consider this recent blog by Jerome Tennille, which says in part:

Many companies are seeking to pivot successfully from in-person employee engagement to forms that allow for social distancing whether virtually or remote. In their quest to achieve this some companies have sought to place that burden on their non-profit partners in the communities they serve. Unfortunately, by placing this responsibility on the non-profit organizations…

Remember: Volunteers are not free for the nonprofit or community group expected to involve them. If you ask an agency to create volunteering opportunities specifically for your employees, you are asking them to spend money and resources they may not be able to afford – so be ready to make an appropriate financial – CASH – donation to a nonprofit or school if you want a customized volunteering gig for your employees at that nonprofit or school. Here’s more advice on how to create successful and appropriate volunteering activities for employees.

cover of Virtual Volunteering book with hands raising up various Internet connected devices

For much more detailed advice on creating assignments for online volunteers, for working with online volunteers, for using the Internet to support and involve ALL volunteers, including volunteers that provide service onsite, and for ensuring success in virtual volunteering, check out The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook. Tools come and go – but certain community engagement principles never change. You will not find a more detailed guide anywhere for working with online volunteers and using the Internet to support and involve all volunteers – even after home quarantines are over and volunteers start coming back onsite to your workspace. It’s available both as a traditional paperback and as an online book. It’s co-written by myself and Susan Ellis.

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

Out-of-work professionals pushing back against volunteer engagement

graphic by Jayne Cravens representing volunteers

It happens regularly: people who are seeking paid work, or who have been laid off from jobs, pushing back against volunteer engagement by previous and potential employers.

I am passionate about volunteer engagement as fundamental to both nonprofit and government programs, as fundamental to giving communities an opportunity to see firsthand what’s happening at these organizations and contributing to a civil society as well, but I am also passionate about volunteers NOT being used just to “save money”, and never to replace paid staff that do not have many alternatives for paid work. It’s why I believe any program should have to say WHY they involve volunteers and say, in writing, how every volunteer engagement will lead to something transformative. It’s why I have joined online protesters and said UN Agencies must defend their unpaid “internships”. It’s why I tell every person who asks me for a webinar or to consult on a project, “here are my consulting rates.” I have very strict guidelines for when I will offer my professional services for free – and even then, sometimes, I enter gray areas where I have to really think about the ethics about what I’m doing.

Once again, there is conflict between people who need paid work and the involvement of volunteers (unpaid labor). This time: many freelancers in the United Kingdom believe furloughed workers who are receiving 80% of their salary and are volunteering their time and professional expertise online (virtual volunteering) with charities via sites like Furlonteer.com are taking away much-needed paid work. This BBC article offers more details about this conflict.

My thoughts: I hope that freelancers will direct their very justified anger at FUNDERS – corporations, foundations, government agencies and individuals – who have whined that nonprofits need to “keep overhead low,” who have often refused outright to pay for anything they consider to be overhead, and who don’t believe nonprofits should ever spend money on expertise – not competitive salaries for employees and not decent salaries for consultants. Nonprofits, charities, NGOs, and other mission-based programs are frequently put into the impossible position by funders of delivering critical services without spending what’s needed for that to happen. Further contributing to the pressure to “get people to do it for free!” are programs like the Points of Light Foundation, the Independent Sector and even the United Nations who loudly, proudly promote the value of volunteering by an hourly rate – the amount of money saved because employees or consultants don’t do those tasks and volunteers are unpaid.

On the Furlonteer.com web site are these words: CHARITIES ARE DESPERATE FOR YOUR HELP. Well, WHY is that? Who created the conditions that have made charities desperate for this help? FUNDERS. I am looking at corporations and foundations in particular.

Also see:

What should be on a corporation’s website re: CSR

If your company has a corporate philanthropy program – it gives money to nonprofits, it supports nonprofit events by buying a table or other sponsorships, its employees volunteer as a part of a volunteer leave program or at events in partnership with the company – it should have at least a page on its website that offers an overview of these activities and your reasons for engaging in such.

Having corporate social responsibility information on a company’s web site not only helps communicate to people outside the company: it also helps a business’s employees to understand the company’s CSR activities and philosophy. Remember that ALL employees and consultants are potential messengers regarding a business’s CSR activities – they need to have a reliable reference point when friends, family and others ask them questions about their company. Having this information on the company web site ensures that there is a uniform message regarding CSR activities.

The link to a company’s CSR information can be on its home page, but most companies put the link on their “About Us” page. 

Here’s what absolutely needs to be on a company’s web site regarding its CSR activities:

  • A statement that provides an overview of the company’s CSR policy, especially with regards to its commitment to a particular cause or the community where employees work, send their children to school, etc.
  • An overview of what the company’s employees do as volunteers and how employee volunteering activities are structured (do they volunteer during company hours, as part of an official program or are employees encouraged to volunteer outside of work hours, but entirely independently? Is the company looking for volunteering opportunities that groups of employee volunteers can do together? Is the company looking for volunteering opportunities that groups of employee volunteers can do with their families?).
  • Information on how a nonprofit, non-governmental organization (NGO), school or other initiative can invite a company’s employees to volunteer with them.
  • An overview of how the company makes financial or in-kind donations, including sponsorships, and information on how a nonprofit, non-governmental organization (NGO), school or other initiative can apply for funds for financial and in-kind donations and sponsorships. If the company does not make financial or in-kind donations, nor purchase sponsorships, it should say so explicitly on its web site.
  • An overview of the financial contributions they company and employees make to the community – not just in donations, not just employee donation matching, but in tax payments to city, county, state and federal treasuries through tax payments.
  • Anything the company requires on the web sites of organizations it funds.

What can also be on a company’s web site regarding CSR activities:

  • An overview of what the company does to be a good to the environment. Does the company recycle materials that employees produce in the workplace? Does the company use recycled materials in its workplace? Does the company recycle all of its old computers, printers, smart phones and other electronics in an environmentally-appropriate way? Does the company have programs that encourage employees to carpool and use mass transit?
  • An overview of the company’s commitment to ethical business practices such as fair hiring, pay equality, safe working environments, adhering to fiduciary responsibilities, having an employee handbook with policies regarding harassment and discrimination, etc. If “corporations are people,” then this information is a must.
  • A statement of the company’s commitment to having an accessible web site, one that meets at least the basic guidelines for digital inclusion (videos are captions, people who have sight-impairments can navigate the web site because it’s been designed so that their assistive technology tools can navigate it, etc.).
  • Photos, videos and other updates about the company’s CSR activities.
  • Evaluations of the company’s CSR programs and their impact. What difference has employee volunteering made for nonprofits? Remember, that doesn’t mean a number of hours or a dollar value for those hours – it means how nonprofit clients or the community actually benefited from the time and talent.

It’s a good idea to invite representatives from nonprofits, charities and schools to provide feedback about a company’s online information about CSR activities. Can they find what they are looking for? Did they understand how to apply for funds – or understand that the company does not give financial donations? This can be done with a focus group or by simply offering a feedback form on the web site.

Look at the site’s web analytics regularly to make sure online CSR  information is being viewed and to see how web visitors are being directed to this information. Are they finding it using keywords in a search engine? From links from a certain page on the web site? Links from a nonprofit blog?

For more tips, see my list index of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) resources & advice for ethics, strategies & operations.

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

Disrupting Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

logoCorporate social responsibility (CSR) means financial donations by for-profit businesses, as well as in-kind donations, employee volunteering or taking on community roles as a representative of a company, such as serving on an advisory board at a nonprofit or government group. CSR also includes commitments and demonstrated action regarding responsible or sustainable environmental practices, pay equality, safe working environments, etc., beyond what is required by law.

Nonprofits, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), charities, schools and other mission-based organizations have wanted to say some things quite frankly to corporations and foundations, but they have been afraid to, for fear of losing their funding.

These organizations are tired of being mocked by the corporate world for not being innovative while also being denied overhead funding necessary to be able to experiment and explore innovation. They are tired of hackathons developing apps that their clients will never use because stakeholders were never consulted. They are tired of being expected to attend roundtable discussions and conferences to talk about serious social issues but not having their time paid for regarding these consultations to give corporations and foundations “insight.” They are tired of having  “executives on loan” from a high-tech company for six months who are more burdens than help.

I’ve even had public school teachers tell me how much they want to tell the big high tech company in their city “no” to its offer to “help” because the company’s ideas are more about good photo opps for the company than actually supporting learning goals – in fact, the company’s ideas take away from essential classroom learning time.

These folks feel they can’t make their complaints known about the attitudes of the for-profit world, so they tell me, in low voices over coffee. They are stressed out – they want a good relationship with the for-profit world, they want volunteers from corporations, but they want to be listened to, they want partnerships to be equal, and they want t

As an independent consultant, I have more freedom to speak than these colleagues. There are things I’ve always wanted to say to the for-profit world about how they approach financial donations, in-kind donations, employee volunteering and other corporate social responsibility (CSR). So I decided it was time to finally say them: I’ve launched a new section on my web site that targets corporations, whether large or small, regarding Corporate Social Responsibility.

My advice is meant to be provocative. It’s meant to be disruptive. Because I believe that CSR is long overdue for some serious disruption.

In my opinion, most CSR-related resources are more concerned with feel-good publicity and have an attitude that mission-based organizations are run by amateurs who chose their professions because they couldn’t make it in the “real” world. There’s a disturbing belief that businesses know better than nonprofits and should, therefore, use their financial gifts to push nonprofits, even public schools, into the directions businesses feel are best.

A lot of people, including several high-profit politicians and the US Supreme Court, believe corporations are “people.” Okay, if that’s the case, then every business, whether a tech-savvy startup, a small storefront or a large corporation, is a citizen of a community: that company’s employees and customers live and work somewhere, and how the employees do their work, how they travel to and for work, and how that work is produced or services are provided impacts neighborhoods, people, cultures and the environment, positively and negatively. No business, no corporation, not even a consultant working at home, is an island that has no impact on other places or people, near or far.

That impact comes with responsibilities, costs and consequences – financial costs, environmental costs and cultural impacts. Maybe farmland becomes industrial lands and housing, small towns become bedroom communities, the land where a popular bowling alley stands becomes so valuable that the prosperous business owners sell and retire – and the community loses a beloved gathering place.

Many of the financial costs that communities, neighborhoods and individuals have to shoulder that result from corporate/business prosperity are not covered by taxes – especially in this day and age of massive tax breaks for corporations and other for-profit companies. Many people are struggling to address those additional costs without any additional funding, while corporations and other businesses experience record profits and larger-than-ever tax breaks.

It’s from that reality that my web pages of advice regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been developed. Expect to be challenged, because my advice is quite different from most, and maybe all, of the other advice you may have been reading or hearing.

Also see:

A history of “Smart Valley”

I recently wrote (and published on my web site) a history of Smart Valley, a 1990s initiative in Silicon Valley, California to create an “information infrastructure” to benefit people, communities, governments & businesses.” Smart Valley was an initiative of Joint Venture: Silicon Valley. It was a 501(c)(6) nonprofit organization focused on creating an “information infrastructure” in Silicon Valley, California – Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, San José, Santa Clara and the surrounding area.

Smart Valley’s many activities included coordinating SmartSchools NetDay II and PC Day in Silicon Valley, creating an Internet Technical Guidebook for Schools, leading a Smart Voter campaign to help people learn about upcoming elections by leveraging online sources (one of the first of such initiatives), creating and supporting the Public Access Network (PAN), hosting Connect 96: The Global Summit on Building Electronic Communities, promoting telecommuting, hosting a monthly series of lectures, Smart Talks, that featured “leaders of the growing information infrastructure”, and hosting the annual Smart Valley Corporate Executive Forum “to touch base with the senior executives of our member companies to review the year’s progress and to explain our plans for the future.”

Among its affiliated projectsmany of which originated at Smart Valley and were spun off as independent initiatives:

  • ABAG, Association of Bay Area Governments
  • BAMTA, The Broad Alliance for Multimedia Technology and Applications
  • BADGER, The Bay Area Digital Geographic Resource
  • CommerceNet, “the premier industry association for Internet Commerce”
  • Plugged In, one of the first digital divide efforts, working to bring “the tremendous technological resources available in the Silicon Valley to youth in low-income communities” in East Palo Alto (you can see archived versions of this initiative at archive.org by searching pluggedin.org before 2012)
  • SV-PAL, the Silicon Valley Public Access Link, is a non-profit volunteer organization which brings Internet access to the South Bay community including local schools, organizations, businesses and individuals.

Why do I care about the history of Smart Valley? Because I was the internal communications manager for Joint Venture in 1995-1996. Smart Valley is one of Joint Venture’s pioneering initiatives that has disappeared from the Internet and is rarely referenced these days, which is a shame, because it was a pioneering effort. I wasn’t involved with Smart Valley, but I really admired what it was doing.

I would have written the Smart Valley history at Wikipedia, but I’m worried it will just get deleted by some guy who decides it isn’t worthy of a Wikipedia entry…

Also see:

  • Early History of Nonprofits & the Internet
    The Internet has always been about people and organizations networking with each other, sharing ideas and comments, and collaborating online. It has always been interactive and dynamic. And there were many nonprofit organizations who “got” it early — earlier than many for-profit companies. So I’ve attempted to set the record straight: I’ve prepared a web page that talks about the early history of nonprofits and the Internet. It focuses on 1995 and previous years. It talks a little about what nonprofits were using the cyberspace for as well at that time and lists the names of key people and organizations who helped get nonprofit organizations using the Internet in substantial numbers in 1995 and before. Edits and additions are welcomed
  • Lessons from NetAid and onlinevolunteering.org
    Some key learnings from directing the UN’s Online Volunteering service from February 2001 to February 2005, including support materials for those using the service to host online volunteers.
  • United Nations Tech4Good / ICT4D Initiatives
    a list of the various United Nations initiatives that have been launched since 2000 to promote the use of computers, feature phones, smart phones and various networked devices in development and humanitarian activities, to promote digital literacy and equitable access to the “information society,” and to bridge the digital divide. My goal in creating this page is to help researchers, as well as to remind current UN initiatives that much work regarding ICT4D has been done by various UN employees, consultants and volunteers for more than 15 years (and perhaps longer?).
  • Al Gore Campaign Pioneered Virtual Volunteering
    Back in 2000, when Al Gore ran for president, his campaign championed virtual volunteering by recruiting online volunteers to help online with his election efforts. I’ve tried to present some of what his campaign did – this pioneering effort deserves to be remembered, as do some of the lessons from such.

How to look at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative

I had planned on writing my thoughts about the Chan Zuckerberg initiative – then found this blog by Anil Dash (thanks, Susan Tenby) which says it better than I can:

It is absolutely fair and necessary to be critical of Zuckerberg’s philanthropic efforts, both past and present, to ensure that this gift of $45 billion dollars is put to good use. That is because the default dispensation of the money will be to waste it. For example, Zuckerberg donated $100 million to Newark schools to almost no effect, in a gift that was revealed to have been explicitly managed by Sheryl Sandberg to be timed to offset the negative publicity surrounding the release of the movie The Social Network. Given that track record, our default assumption should be that this is a similar move, though obviously this announcment (sic) being coupled to the birth of their daughter makes such assumptions seem churlish or rude.”

Please read the full blog by Anil Dash here.

Should the NFL involve volunteers for the Super Bowl?

Taking a break from promoting The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook to talk volunteers and the Super Bowl (for those outside the USA, that’s the National Football League’s championship game).

In a story by the New York Times, Alfred Kelly, the chief executive of the New York-New Jersey Super Bowl Host Committee, estimated that 9,000 people would serve as volunteers in the days leading to the Super Bowl . That is far fewer than the 20,000 who were initially contemplated. Those numbers are down because the NFL opted to hire temporary paid workers for positions in which volunteers had typically been used. The decision was an apparent response to a class-action suit against Major League Baseball in the USA, which did not pay volunteers at the All-Star FanFest in July 2013.

It took me a LONG time to find out what volunteers actually *do* for this billion-dollar nonprofit with millionaire staff. From what I can tell, volunteers are at sites like airports, hotels and various transportation hubs days before the game to direct city visitors to whatever they need – transportation, bathrooms, etc.  And if that’s the case then – hold on to your hats – I’m fine with those roles being filled by volunteers. Why? Because, in those situations, I think these roles are best filled by volunteers – people who aren’t there for any financial gain, who want to be seen as volunteers, specifically, in doing these tasks: I’m here because I want to be here, because I love football and love my city, and I want to make you feel welcomed. But if volunteers are asked to do anything else – selling anything, cleaning anything, moving or hauling things, etc. – I have a HUGE problem with having these roles filled by unpaid staff, because I don’t see why volunteers would be best of those roles other than the NFL getting out of not paying people.

Even if the NFL wasn’t, officially, a nonprofit organization (which, by the way, I find that outrageous, IRS!), I would feel this way about its volunteer-involvement. Why? Because if I truly believe that some activities are best staffed by volunteers, NEVER as a money-saving activity but, rather, because unpaid people are best in that roles, I have to believe it for every sector.

Back in the summer of 2010, I attended an event by Triumph motorcycles in the city where I was living at the time (Canby, Oregon). The company had brought about 20 motorcycles you could sign up to ride, on group rides, every 30 minutes. The Triumph truck traveled all over the USA to bring these events to cities all over, and these Triumph events were staffed primarily by VOLUNTEERS. Because volunteers are “free”? Nope (volunteers are never free!). It was because an event attendee talking to a volunteer — someone who owns at least one of the motorcycles in the line up, and owned at least one other probably at some point, who can speak passionately about the product, who wants you to get to have the experience they have been having, and who won’t get any commission from a sale and doesn’t rely on this activity for their financial livelihood — is in such contrast to talking to a salesperson or paid staff person. The few paid staff there stayed in the background, there to fill in blanks and maybe to make a sale, but volunteers were the official spokespeople. It gave the event a total no-sales-pressure feel from a customer point of view – it was just a day to enjoy Triumph motorcycles.

I’ve never forgotten that experience. And it’s one of the reasons why I’m not ready to condemn the NFL’s involvement of volunteers. At least not until I can see what exactly it is that they do.

UPDATE: an article from The Star Ledger about what NFL Super Bowl volunteers did in 2014. Note – 1500 ambassadors were paid. Did those paid folks do the SAME work as the volunteers, or something more/different?

And now, back to promoting The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook.

Also see:

Have you ever changed your mind?.

Learning, learning everywhere, a blog about where I find new marketing and volunteer engagement ideas (spoiler alert: it’s not at conferences or workshops)