Monthly Archives: August 2025

may non-citizens & non-green card holders volunteer in the USA? exploring the complicated answer

Someone who manages the volunteer program at a public library here in Oregon wrote me. She said:

Images, in the style of petroglyphs, of people doing various activities, like writing or construction.

I’m looking for input from the field about accepting the non working spouse/family member of an H1B Visa holder, as a volunteer. Because these people do not have social security numbers, our background check process can’t accept them. This is counter to our library mission “For Everyone” and seems to run counter to our sanctuary city status. HR/RISK says it’s an issue largely due to our city’s insurance coverage. I say, I’ve mitigated the Risk and volunteers are not in a position that places them one on one with any patron, staff, or other volunteer. I have also run across information that seems to indicate visa holding people may put their visa status at risk by volunteering. Wondering if you have any words of wisdom I can use to advocate for being able to include these folks who wish to share their time and talent with us, but can’t pass a standard background check. (Don’t get me started on background checks).

I’m going to share the advice I gave her here, edited to protect her identity and organization. Perhaps this might help others.

And I have to start with a disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer, I don’t have a law degree, and so none of this can be considered legal advice. 

In short: I think it’s absolutely fine to involve an HB1 Visa holder, and even someone here on a tourist visa, in volunteering at a nonprofit organization. But stay away from anything that could be seen as an unpaid internship (ongoing role), even for a student. And it gets even trickier with tourist visas.

Let’s get into the details:

How long has the person that does not have a social security number been in the USA? And in that time they have been in the USA, have they been in the same county and state? So, for instance, if the person has been in the same county for a year or more, then there should be a way to do a criminal background check with the sheriff’s department for the time they have lived here. The local police certainly have no problem arresting people without a social security number… but any check with local law enforcement would be for only the time the person has lived in that state. 

Another option depends on what country the person is from. With online volunteers in mentoring programs, I have asked international participants to provide a letter from their local police in the country where they live to say that they are a person in “good standing” – also called a “certificate of good conduct.” Depending on what country they are from, they may be able to get this through their embassy or consulate here, for the area where they lived previously. No police in any country in Europe had any problem supplying such. But I’ve never had to do it for anyone outside of Europe.

Here’s a UK resource that touches on this.

I also think asking for professional and academic references, and following up on those, is a good idea – no matter what country they are in. I did that as well and I’m happy to provide you with the questions I asked them.    

All that said… you should check with other libraries: maybe someone in the New York City or Chicago public library system, Atlanta, etc. And let me know what they say!

“I say, I’ve mitigated the Risk and volunteers are not in a position that places them one on one with any patron, staff, or other volunteer.”

RIGHT?!?! That should be enough! ARGH!!!

“I have also run across information that seems to indicate visa holding people may put their visa status at risk by volunteering.”

Here’s a resource from Dartmouth that can help.

And one from the US Department of Labor, which says “Individuals who volunteer or donate their services, usually on a part-time basis, for public service, religious or humanitarian objectives, not as employees and without contemplation of pay, are not considered employees of the religious, charitable or similar non-profit organizations that receive their service.”

and this also from the US Department of Labor, regarding unpaid internships (a no-no for people without work visas).

I read all of this as it being absolutely fine to involve this couple in volunteering. 

Volunteering can turn into a problem for foreigners in the USA, or trying to come to the USA, on a tourist visa, or “volunteering” (working for free) for a family or for-profit company, even via Workaway or whatever.

For instance, Australian traveler Madolline Gourley visited the USA multiple times over several years to cat-sit in exchange for free accommodation – she was never paid money. But this year, she was stopped while transiting through Hawaii to Canada. Officials at a USA airport determined that what she was doing amounted to unauthorized work. She was detained for hours, her visa waiver was revoked, and she was ultimately deported.

Rebecca Burke,, a graphic artist from Monmouthshire in England, was trying to cross into the state of Washington from Canada when she was refused entry. She was planning to stay with a host family where she would carry out domestic chores in exchange for accommodation. Canadian officials told she should have applied for a working visa, instead of a tourist visa. So she went back to Canada, applied for what she thought was the right visa, and then tried again. But when she tried to re-enter the US she was handcuffed and put in a cell before being taken to Tacoma Northwest detention facility in Washington state.

(Workaway warns users that they “will need the correct visa for any country that you visit”, and that it is the user’s responsibility to get one, but it doesn’t stipulate what the correct visa is for the kind of arrangements it facilitates in any given country. )

But what about people who are going to volunteer for an organization – not pet sit or house sit or garden or whatever in exchange for free housing?

That can be complicated as well.

A group of church volunteers from Canada heading south to do relief work in 2017 in New Jersey were denied entry to the USA for fear they would take American construction jobs. The 12-person contingent from Hamilton’s Rehoboth United Reformed Church intended to spend March break cleaning up and rehabilitating neighbourhoods affected by Hurricane Sandy.

U.S. border law says Canadians do not require a visa to enter the country for volunteer work, as long as they can provide proof that their work will not be compensated. The group was told they had failed to have a letter sent from the host church “paroling” them into the country. The border patrol officer told the group he would grant an exception and let them through if the host church managed to fax or email a letter right away.

When the first letter was deemed “not specific enough” by a border patrol officer, the group asked the New Jersey host church send another, being careful not to make any specific reference to construction. 

“In general, mission teams do team-building, tour mercy ministries of the church (food pantries, re-entry programs, thrift shops, etc) and assist with neighbourhood cleanup projects,” said the second letter. It was this last part that was interpreted as “work for hire,” says Hoeksema. Officers denied them entry after they had been stopped for more than two hours. The group was told that, as foreigners, they would be taking American jobs, and that there was no pressing need for relief work anyway this long after Hurricane Sandy hit the region in 2012.

A U.S. border spokesperson said the refusal came down to documentation. The official said groups doing humanitarian work need to provide documentation in advance from the municipality where the work is to be done stating what they will be doing.

Canadian media outlets reported also in 2017 that four Canadian senior citizens on their way to volunteer as ushers a performance of The Color Purple at the Fisher Theater in Detroit were detained, photographed, fingerprinted and eventually denied entry to the USA because non-American volunteers are only allowed to participate in religious or nonprofit events. The women, who had been volunteering for years at the theater, said they never had a problem before. The then USA Customs and Border Patrol Chief Ken Hammond told the Detroit Free Press that he can’t discuss individual cases for privacy reasons, but he referenced the Immigration and Nationality Act, stating that aliens volunteering in a program that benefits USA communities must establish that they are members of and are committed to “a particular recognized religious or nonprofit charitable organization.” 

The Fisher Theater is a FOR-profit (commercial) theater. Had it been a nonprofit theater, even with a for-profit Broadway touring show playing, they PROBABLY wouldn’t have been turned away at the border if they had been carrying a letter from the theater with their 501 c 3 number and a statement that this was a nonprofit organization, stated their mission, and they reserve usher roles specifically for volunteers as a part of their commitment to ensure the arts are accessible to more people.  

I have been telling people from other countries who are coming to the USA on a tourist visa but who might volunteer while here to say to the border enforcement folks that they are coming here as a tourist and to be absolutely open about all the places they plan to visit, and even say “I plan on attending the WHATEVEREVENT (cycling event, running event, motorcycle rally, etc.)”, but do NOT volunteer the information that they will be volunteering. Just emphasize how much they love cycling or running or motorcycling. And to make sure they do NOT have a post on social media saying, “Hey, I’m going to the USA to volunteer at the WHATEVEREVENT!” Carrying a letter from the organization where you are going to volunteer, stating that the organization is a 501 c 3 nonprofit, stating that the role you are doing is one they reserve specifically for volunteers, and with a statement as to WHY they do that (eg “we believe volunteer engagement is a way for people who care about such-and-such to be involved in this cause that they care about in a way that is more intimate and meaningful than merely attending the event”) can be helpful if you need to say that, as part of your traveling, you will be volunteering.

I am not encouraging anyone to do something illegal per the advice in that previous paragraph. But border agents in the USA make mistakes and currently are looking for ANY reason to turn foreigners away, or even arrest people trying to come into the country, including the wrong reason.

I’ve been telling people that are from other countries that are coming here to blog about their trip to either not come at all (there’s a pretty famous motorcycle blogger, Itchy Boots, who cancelled her US trip to promote her book because of the nonsense at the US border) or to NOT mention their YouTube channel or blogging when they are interviewed – emphasize you’re touring the US as a backpacker or whatever, period. 

— end —

Also see Welcoming Immigrants as Volunteers to your Nonprofit.

If you have other advice, please share it. Please cite sources – no “I think I heard that…”

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

URGENT: if your USA-based program involves volunteers, you need to create a budget NOW & fight for it when budget cuts are discussed

image of a panel discussion

Along with the massive slashing of US government budgets, the demand for nonprofit services is going to be even greater than before – and nonprofits, per losing so much government funding (and corporate funding – layoffs abound) are going to have less and less resources.

A lot of boards at nonprofits are going to naively think, “Oh, let’s just get more volunteers – while also cutting the budget of the volunteer program, including firing the volunteer manager.”

If you work with volunteers at your nonprofit, regardless of if your title is manager of volunteers or not, there are three things you need to do RIGHT NOW, urgently, if you want to keep involving volunteers at your nonprofit and be ready to face the severe budget cuts coming.

1) you need to prepare a budget, RIGHT NOW, on what it costs to engage volunteers at your organization. That budget should include:

  • the percentage of staff time, at dollar value, to engage with and support volunteers
  • all expenses related to recruitment (that will include a portion of your web site hosting)
  • all expenses related to training and supervision (any software you pay to use for this)
  • all expenses related to appreciation/recognition (items you give to volunteers, rentals of space for volunteer events, etc.)
  • costs associated with volunteer management software
  • costs associated with background checks
  • advertising costs
  • travel costs
  • office supplies
  • insurance
  • volunteer center membership
  • professional development of those working with volunteers (training, certification, publications, conferences, membership fees, etc.)

2) You also need to create a chart that shows, as simply as possible, what it takes to onboard a new volunteer and to support your new volunteers. It needs to show exactly who does what at each step.

If you don’t do this, and communicate it to senior staff and the board, the budget cuts they make will be arbitrary, and volunteer engagement will plummet (so will individual donations, FYI).

3) And the third thing you must do: you must show the impact of your volunteer program. The number of volunteers you involved and the number of hours they gave IS NOT IMPACT. Testimonials from clients and staff about the impact volunteers made with them is impact. Testimonials from volunteers about how they did not understand fully what your nonprofit was doing before or the issue they were addressing, but now they do, because of their volunteering, is impact. Volunteers themselves can help you gather this data.

Also see:

Your Nonprofit CAN Resist. Here’s how.

Told ya. & I’m still telling you.

Could your nonprofit be the target of an ICE raid? Are you prepared?

What’s the future of international humanitarian development & foreign relations careers?

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

Final report on results of US support in Afghanistan until the Taliban retook the country

The flag of Afghanistan

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) was set up in 2008 by the US government to assess US efforts in support of Afghanistan. On July 30, two weeks before the fourth anniversary of the Taliban retaking power in Afghanistan, SIGAR made its its 68th and final quarterly report to Congress, with damning details of waste and “pervasive corruption” over the course of the nearly 20-year Western intervention as well as concerns about Trump administration aid cuts.

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty wrote a summary of the 99 page report. Some things that stood out to me:

In a section titled “End-Of-Mission Highlights,” it says the Western-backed Afghan government sometimes didn’t even want projects that the United States proposed.

“For example, SIGAR found that most of the buildings at five Afghan Border Police facilities costing $26 million were either unoccupied or being used for unintended purposes, including one used as a chicken coop,” it says.

The report states that Western countries and global institutions flooded Afghanistan with money that fueled corruption, which US officials overlooked as they “prioritized security and political goals.”

But the final SIGAR report is not only a look back at the mission as a whole.

It also underlines the humanitarian impact of the Trump administration’s decisions to cut aid to Afghanistan and says the State Department did not explain why specific programs were being terminated.

SIGAR will cease operations in September.

Before then, it will produce one more report looking at how lessons learned in Afghanistan, Gaza, Syria, and elsewhere can be applied to future situations where aid missions face interference in undemocratic countries.

Also see

My work in Afghanistan in 2007 (and for the country after that).

The endangered women left behind in Afghanistan.

Digital Dunkirk: online volunteers scramble to help endangered Afghans get visas & out of Afghanistan.

If you ignore women in Afghanistan, development efforts there will fail (2017).

UNDP and Religious Leaders Promote Women in Sport and Education in Afghanistan (2017).

*Another* Afghanistan Handicraft program? Really? (2011).

My request to my US congressional representatives regarding Afghan refugees.

Our Lady of the Manifest: the icon for a very particular community of online volunteers.

Fleeing Afghanistan: “Experiencing the Dark Time: Caught Up In a Cage“: a first hand account, edited by me, of fleeing Afghanistan in 2021.

Fleeing Afghanistan, Living As a Refugee: Safe, But Without Joy: a first hand account, edited by me, of the aforementioned asylum seeker and her life as of September 2023.

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help

Nonprofits, don’t cede creativity or curiosity or customer relations to AI, & keep your use of AI ethical

HAL from 2001 a space odyssey

I’ve been writing about how computer and Internet technologies can, and do, affect the work of nonprofits, NGOs, government agencies and other mission-based programs (as opposed to for-profit businesses) since the 1990s. I’ve been mostly a cheerleader for such, but also have tried to be realistic and to highlight cautions. So you shouldn’t be surprised that I have thoughts about AI and how it will, and is, affecting that work and those we serve.

I’ve warned about relying too much on the choices of Canva when creating designs. I’ve warned about ceding too much of your client interactions to AI. I’ve warned about how AI can have disastrous results when rewriting something.

And then there is the creative laziness AI seems to encourage. In an earlier blog I warned nonprofits to be careful using Canva, since their graphics are starting to all look the same. Here’s a new story about why reliance on Canva and similar AI graphic programs can be a bad choice: months ago, I had a volunteer from a high school who was supposed to create social media graphics in association with various holidays for a nonprofit I worked for. He turned in designs that were obviously the first template choice offered by Canva, with just our nonprofit logo and a date inserted somewhere – no other alterations at all. He supposedly had taken a marketing class that included learning graphic design basics, but seemed flummoxed when I talked about the need for color contrast, easy-to-read fonts, and the importance of ads being readable without someone having to have glasses. And don’t even get me started on Canva’s profound lack of diversity among its human images in terms of ethnicities, body types and ages. I ended up having to alter all of his work – spending more time on the task, not less.

Using AI-powered chatbots for schoolwork is undermining opportunities for young people to learn skills such as analyzing text, elaborating syntheses and writing coherent narratives. The writing process stimulates thinking, scrutinizing and self-improvement, tasks that all people should learn. But when it is
outsourced to AI, people not only don’t have that stimulation or mental improvement, the reduction in cognitive effort can reduce memory retention and diminish learning and cognitive abilities (cited in the Human Development Report on page 73 and in Blanchflower, D. G., Bryson, A., and Xu, X. 2024, “The Declining Mental Health of the Young and the Global Disappearance of the Hump Shape in Age in Unhappiness.” Working Paper 32337, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).

I’m working with someone right now who uses AI to write all of his emails and reports. These never provide me with the information I need – information I always got when his predecessor wrote the reports and emails herself (and in MUCH shorter form). For some reason, AI always deletes out the essential info I need for marketing efforts.

AI is determining what we see online, and hiding what someone or a company has decided they do not want us to see. Content is being curated, sorted and ranked by machine learning based on the desires of one person or a company, often with users not having any idea that this is happening. I’m using two and three different search engines whenever I do research, because the results are always so different.

AI-written text is showing up with hallucinated facts across the Internet landscape and creeping into the people and government’s decision-making. And if AI is leveraged to degrade human rights or coerce people to believe a lie or harm others, it’s NOT an ally. It’s easy to find examples of this all over the Internet.

I blogged what I feel are highlights from the 2025 Human Development Report from UNDP – the theme is artificial intelligence. It’s worth noting that I do highlight positives regarding AI – because there are positives.

We live in a world where trust and credibility is more important than ever before. We’re going to lose more of that if we keep ceding creativity, curiosity and human interactions to AI.

There are a lot of companies who are now telling their employees that they are not allowed to suggest the creation of any new positions – paid staff or consultants – unless they can prove AI could not do most of that job. That means the elimination of graphic design positions, receptionists, data analysts, social media managers, consultants brought on to create and design special products (annual reports, specific marketing campaigns) and managers of volunteer programs who spend most of their time reviewing applications and screening new volunteers. Yes, AI can do all of those jobs – but not well, and not to the standards nonprofits need. As more and more people are using AI to both summarize texts and write emails and reports as well as reading those texts and emails and reports, humans are less and less involved – thereby missing trends, insights and potential challenges, while clients and customers become more and more frustrated trying to get answers to questions and help to solve problems.

A way to counter this AI use demand by management: be able to say, right now, how you are leveraging AI in your work. Show that you are already using it to save money, such as grammar correction programs, graphic design programs, donor data analysis, volunteer data analysis, translating and news alerts regarding certain topics. But then also show why you hold on to certain tasks, like interacting with clients in real-time, because cultivating and sustaining trust with various stakeholders.

What I find fascinating in this push for nonprofits to use AI is that a much better strategy is to push nonprofits to engage more volunteers, thereby doing what AI cannot: engage with the community more, cultivate more supporters, and build more awareness and understanding about the nonprofit and the cause it addresses.

One last thing: if you use AI in any communications, DECLARE IT. If you write an email to someone and you used AI to create that email, declare it. Declare in any online or offline publication if the material was created or authored, primarily, by AI. If you publish a blog that has content that was, even in part, created by AI, say so. “Some of the content of this article was created using AI.” Affirm if an article or blog is written by a human: give credit to the person or people responsible for such, by name.

If your nonprofit has a chatbot for clients, be clear that the chatbot is not a human, that it’s AI. Many people do NOT understand that a box with a human image that says, “Hi, how can I help you?” is not a human.

I have an affirmation on my web site that my web site is created & managed by a human. Consider doing the same on your own web site (but only if it’s true).

Also see

Artificial Intelligence – friend or foe for nonprofits?

schedule social media posts? use with caution

No app can substitute for actually talking with people

If you have benefited from this blog or other parts of my web site and would like to support the time that went into researching information, developing material, preparing articles, updating pages, etc. (I receive no funding for this work), here is how you can help